Electronic Portal Imaging (EPID) L1-053
Unclaimed Principle — open for contribution
This Principle is declared in the catalog but has no reference solver, no pinned dataset, and is not registered on-chain. There is no reward pool. Submitting a cert against this Principle today will record the cert for reproducibility but pay zero PWM.
To claim it as a Bounty #7 contribution: open a PR adding (1) a reference solver, (2) ≥1 dataset pinned to IPFS, (3) updates to the L3 manifest with dataset CIDs. After verifier-agent triple-review, the founders' 3-of-5 multisig signs PWMRegistry.register() and the Principle becomes mineable.
Forward model E
Electronic Portal Imaging (EPID): portal imaging mv produces the measurement through a 4-node primitive DAG L.mv_xray_source -> L.patient_attenuation -> D.amorphous_silicon_panel -> int.spatial, with spatially-projected accumulation and photon-shot-noise-limited (Poisson counting). Recovery is posed as a linear inverse problem that inverts the forward operator to estimate the scene-side 2D attenuation projection. Difficulty tier delta=3 with effective condition number kappa_eff~9; calibration-level mismatch (scatter, optical_glare, panel_saturation) sets the accuracy floor at the Omega boundary. See the forward_model field for the closed-form imaging equation.
L-DAG
Well-posedness W
- Existence:
- true
- Uniqueness:
- true
- Stability:
- conditional
- κ:
- 180
Existence of the recovered 2D attenuation projection is guaranteed within the declared Omega bounds. Uniqueness holds on the measurement-supported subspace; out-of-support modes are controlled by the declared priors. Stability is well-conditioned (kappa_eff ~= 9); scatter dominates the stability cliff; optical_glare and the remaining mismatch parameters contribute higher-order bias terms. Photon-shot-noise-limited (poisson counting) sets the irreducible data-fidelity floor, while mild Tikhonov or analytic inversion is sufficient at the nominal Omega point.
Solvability C
- Solver class:
- analytic / closed-form + post-processing [Simple-Subtract] | linear-operator + convex optimisation [Scatter-Correct] | linear-operator + deep neural prior [Portal-Net]
- Convergence rate q:
- 2
- Complexity:
- O(H * W * log(...)) per iteration; learned variants: O(H W Z * F_theta_cost) per forward pass